Sexism, Corruption and Totalitarianism Was Defeated In America's Historic 2016 Election

Those who represented sexism, corruption and totalitarianism were beaten in America's shocking 2016 election.

Hillary Clinton was a candidate who represented sexism. As detailed in a recent post, she planned an administration based on sexism. Hillary intended to enact rules making false rape accusations easier thereby making the expulsion of male students from college easier. She also planned on marginalizing male workers and had no interesting in representing male citizens whatsoever. Her sexist polices mirrored that of many major news organizations such as the New York Times, CBSNews, YahooNews and others. This is one of the reasons why most large news outlets endorsed her.

The election also revealed widespread fraud and corruption within the American media. Major News organizations claim they are factual and objective. However, the 2016 election showed they were biased and corrupt. WikiLeaks emails revealed CNN colluded with the Hillary Clinton campaign in devising questions to ask rival candidate Donald Trump in an upcoming interview. CNN's intent was to undermine Trump's credibility and make Hillary appear thoughtful. Wikileaks also exposed similar collusion between the Hillary Campaign and the New York Times. Emails showed the newspaper crafted its articles, in coordination with the Hillary campaign so that they projected Hillary in a positive light while simultaneously emplacing any of Trumps errors.

Other American major news outlets were also fraudulent in their reporting. For example, after voting was completed YahooNews wrote a story claiming "Many liberal and moderate Americans" were protesting against Trump’s election. The article implied the vast majority of Americans wanted the voting results overturned. In fact, only violent left wing extremists were protesting. Most Americans accepted the democratic results just as they have always done in past referendums. However, after the 2016 voting results, far left wing totalitarians, began assaulting people and destroying property. The protestors oppose free speech and are intolerant of other opinions. An example of their violent and totalitarian mentality is here.

Additionally, other examples occurred in Indianapolis, where left wing crowds chanted 'kill the police' while in Portland left wing riots occurred causing a fair amount of property damage and in Washington, D.C these protesters held up a sign "RAPE MELANIA”. The sign was in reference to Melania Trump, the president elects wife.

Major news organizations such as NBC, CBS, New York Times and YahooNews covered up or minimized much of the violence perpetrated by the far left protesters. The reason for this cover up is that most American journalists represent the far left. They believe in the same violent, intolerant mentality as the left wing protesters. American journalists do not tolerate opposing views. They smear and misrepresent anyone or organization they disagree with.

As an example, in a TIME Magazine article, a reporter smeared mens rights activists as right wing extremists, claimed anyone not liking the female Ghostbusters was a right wing troll and asserted men questioning feminist media critic Anita Sarkeesian's philosophy are sexist. He used isolated incidents to smear anyone he disagrees with as a 'white male Nazi'. The reporter concluded the internet is being overrun by trolls.

In reality, this far left wing journalist was angry that internet bloggers were stating opinions that were not identical to his own. He wants to stamp out all views that do not mirror his own.

Here lies the true historical nature of the 2016 election. Nearly all of the mass media smeared Hillary Clinton's opponents. There was no objectivity whatsoever concerning campaign coverage. ABCNews, CBSNews, NBCNews, YahooNewss, New York Times, Washington Post, CNN and other outlets regularly produced articles smearing both Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump as sexist, incompetent and extremists. Meanwhile, Hillary was portrayed as an sincere, insightful leader. Despite this lengthy propaganda campaign from large news networks, THEIR CANDIDATE LOST. The media was defeated by the internet. Bloggers and websites circumvented traditional news outlets and broke their monopoly on information. News organizations were exposed as corrupt while their journalists were unmasked as totalitarian. For the first time in American history, citizens effectively challenged media claims.

America's November election destroyed the last vestiges of media credibility and integrity. Journalists are no longer trusted. They are seen as spin doctors promoting their own intolerance.

Those who wanted a U.S. administration based on sexism and those who practiced corruption and intolerance were beaten in the 2016 presidential election

November 29, 2016

Hillary Rodham Clinton Will Be a Sexist President If Elected

Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is campaigning on policies showing her administration will be based on sexism. She does not view all Americans as equal.

For example, Hillary claims there is a rape culture on college campus and that she plans on doing something about it. Her presidential campaign website states she will:
"Provide comprehensive support to survivors"
"Ensure a fair process for all. Too often, the process of addressing a sexual assault on campus is confusing and convoluted. Many who choose to report sexual assault in the criminal justice system fear that their voices will be dismissed instead of heard."
"Increasing prevention efforts : We should increase sexual violence prevention education programs that cover issues like consent and bystander intervention and make sure we have programs not only in college but also in secondary school"

Thus Ms. Clinton will support ‘survivors’ (typically women) but not the accused (typically men). Accused students are assumed guilty. Additionally, she believes students claiming they were sexually assaulted should be heard but those being accused should be silenced. Lastly, she wants an increase in white knight culture. According to her bystander plan, men should fight any man if a women implicates him of any sexual indiscretion. Her administration will view female students as important and male students as sexual abusers.

She supports her plan by stating “An estimated one in five women reports being sexually assaulted while in college.”

Her website goes on to say

“Hillary has led efforts to address violence against women her entire career. Hillary supported the creation of the Department of Justice’s Office on Violence Against Women. As senator, Hillary co-sponsored the 2005 reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act.” “As secretary of state, Hillary rallied the international community to take collective action to end violence against women.”
Thus, in her entire career, she has done nothing about violence against men. Nor does she consider violence against men by women as an issue of any significance. This reveals her feminist mentality that grown adult women should not be held accountable for their actions and that men are not equal to women. Greater detail of her views are presented here.

Her presidential campaign website also states

“America has taken tremendous strides when it comes to expanding opportunity for women—but many women still face barriers to entering and advancing in the workforce, and the ability of women to make their own health decisions is under assault. Hillary believes that issues that affect women’s lives are family issues, economic issues, and crucial to our future competitiveness. She has been fighting for women and girls her entire career, and she’s just getting started"
"As president, Hillary will: Work to close the pay gap. Women earn less than men across our economy—and women of color often lose out the most. We should promote pay transparency across the economy and work to pass the Paycheck Fairness Act—a bill Hillary introduced as senator—to give women the tools they need to fight discrimination in the workforce."

Hillary does not believe men’s lives are family and economic issues which are crucial to the country’s future competiveness. Her focus will be on women. Over the past three decades men’s participation in America’s labor force has steadily declined. Their ability to find permanent employment has decreased. PEW Research states “the labor market trajectory of males in the U.S. has turned downward along four dimensions: skills acquisition; employment rates; occupational stature; and real wage levels.”  Hillary has no plans to address this issue. Its not relevant to her. In her own words, she has been fighting ONLY for ‘women and girls her entire career’. Her female centric plan is shown here.

Ms. Clinton also demands women in general be paid more money. Her plan for raising women’s wages is detailed here.

Lastly, Hillary’s foreign policy will be based on feminism. Her website states:
She declared to the world that women’s rights are human rights".
"As secretary of state, Hillary worked to bring down barriers that stop women and girls from reaching their potential. She championed programs to advance women’s economic participation, address gender-based violence, and elevate the status of women and girls around the world.”
"Hillary created the first ever ambassador-at-large for global women’s issues—now a permanent position within the State Department—to ensure that women’s issues are always at the cornerstone of our country’s foreign policy."
Under Hillary, American foreign policy will not be based on the security and economic advancement of the country. Instead, it will be based on the status of women in foreign territory. Additionally, Ms. Clinton has no program advancing men’s economic participation nor addressing gender based violence against men anywhere in the world. Men’s rights are not seen as human rights neither abroad nor at home. More of her administration’s proposed focus is seen here.

Much of Ms. Clinton’s domestic and foreign policies will be based on how they affect women. American men are simply an afterthought. This is why she stated on MSNBC March 14, 2016
“We’ve got to continue to support the Libyan people to give them a chance. Because, otherwise, you see what’s happened in Syria with the consequences of millions of people flooding out of Syria, with more than 250,000 people killed, with terrorist groups like ISIS taking up a huge swath of territory as big as some of the states in the area. Libya was a different kind of calculation and we didn’t lose a single person.”
Libya has become a mess because of her lack of foresight concerning the country’s chaos after Gaddafi’s elimination. Furthermore, we did lose people!. Four Americans were killed when their consulate in Benghazi was stormed by terrorists. Since all those lost were men, it did not register on Hillary’s feminist brain that they were of any significance.

Hillary Clinton views herself as a representative of female voters – particularly white suburban female voters. She simply doesn’t represent men. That’s why she has no plan to address false rape accusations on college campuses. She also has no plan addressing low male college graduation rates nor a plan reversing the downward trend of men’s employment in the labor market. She has no interest in helping men obtain new job skills for the changing economy. She has no intention of altering the anti-male family court system nor enacting any type of paternity fraud legislation. Her interest is in women ONLY. She is a feminist.

For men, Hillary Clinton is not the answer. In fact, her sexist mentality is part of the problem.

October 27, 2016

Maryland Courts Protect Domestic Abusers

A married couple in LanHam, Maryland  got into an argument at their home on the 9400 block of Worrell Avenue. According to Prince George's County police,  the husband, Fragoso-Duana, 36, then walked away from the home.  His wife, Araceli Alvarez-Mendoza, 37, subsequently followed him in an SUV, drove alongside him for a bit and then ran him over with her vehicle.

A man witnessing the domestic incident called 911. According to the Washington Post, the caller told a 911 operator “Oh, my God, I can’t believe I witnessed that.  A man was running down the road and a truck just ran him over on purpose and the truck is sitting on top of him.”  A Washington DC news station, WUSA9, stated a security camera video "appears to show Alvarez-Mendoza intentionally accelerating toward her husband, who is running away. After being struck the vehicle continues to drag the victim until it strikes a tree."  Alvarez-Mendoza’s husband was trapped under the SUV and died at the scene.

Araceli Alvarez-Mendoza, 38, was recently sentenced to a mere 6 years in jail for this deadly domestic assault.

In the city of Laurel, another wife, Marquita Berry-Sutton, stabbed her husband, Johnnie Sutton III, 121 times. He died at the scene. The wife claimed her husband was about to sexually assault her, though there is no history of domestic attacks. Johnnie Sutton was unable to state his side of the story because he was dead. Marquita was convicted of murder and sentenced to only 10 years in prison.

When husbands assault their wives, the sentencing outcome is vastly different.

A Gaithersburg husband killed his wife in July 2014. Montgomery County police said the husband, Cola Beale, called around 10:30 a.m. on July 27 and said he had grabbed his wife and “swung her down the stairs.” He told police he saw blood coming from his wife’s head, but that she was still breathing when he left the residence. When police arrived she was dead. Beale was sentenced to 40 years in prison.

 A St Mary's County husband, Ryan Holness, wanted to divorce his wife Serika Holness.  He obtained a $500,000 life insurance policy on his wife and made himself the sole beneficiary. With the help of a friend, Mr Holness then stabbed his wife to death in a remote area of Kent County. For his crime, Ryan Holness was sentenced to life in prison. His friend, Dellando Recardo Campbell, was sentenced to 30 years in prison.

In 2012, Robert Jarrett of Elkridge was arrested for killing his wife in 1991. In August 2013, he was sentenced to 30 years in prison.

Statewide, only one domestic abuse case was discovered where a violent wife was sentenced to a similar lengthy prison term. Jaclyn Martin of Dundalk was sentenced in 2012 to 60 years in prison for the murder of her husband.

Murdering a wife is judicially a more serious crime than murdering a husband in the state of Maryland. The reason for this sexist double standard is feminism.

Feminist groups such as Court Watch Montgomery, House of Ruth and many other organizations work closely with the state's judicial system.  When a wife commits domestic abuse, these feminist organizations urge her to claim she was raped, or abused, or her husband's murder was an accident, or her husband threatened the kids, or a host of other lies. Using this fraudulent claim, feminists then persuade and apply political pressure against both prosecutor and judge to lessen any potential punishment against the violent wife. In Araceli Alvarez-Mendoza's case, the claim used was 'she accidentally ran over her husband' - despite the fact a witness asserted otherwise.

When husbands committing domestic violence use similar excuses, these same organizations threaten sex discrimination lawsuits against Maryland jurisdictions. Feminists state a husband can never have an excuse for killing his wife.

Within this state's legal system, domestic abusers are not really judged on the basis of their actions. Instead, they are judged and sentenced on the basis of their gender.  It’s as if Araceli Alvarez-Mendoza sprinkled magical female pixie dust on her husband while she ran over him thereby making his murder not so bad. Feminism is an ideology of sexism. It needs to be removed from Maryland's judicial process.

October 10, 2016

Court Protects Violent White Knight

Daniel Copeland went on vacation with his girlfriend Megan Natasha Evans in Towyn, Great Britain. They were on the last night of their holiday when the violence broke out.

Evans had been drinking and in her drunken state argued with Mr. Copeland. She then pulled out a knife and began screaming and attacking Copeland. Judge Niclas Parry said “It was a sustained, repeated assault by Evans who with a knife caused an injury to the abdomen which was very serious. The victim [Copeland] understandably believed that she was going to stab him."  The judge said she was disarmed but then picked up a second knife and continued attacking her boyfriend.

Raffal Kossowski heard the screaming woman and automatically believed she was being attacked. Kossowski then preceded to act like a white knight dufus. He burst into the couple's room inorder to protect the woman. Kossowski assaulted Mr. Copleand, kicking him with such violent force that he broke Copleand's arm. Copeland was then dragged outside and beaten up by Kossowski friends. The incident left the victim with a broken arm, cuts to his fingers and an injury to the abdomen.

In court both Evans and Kossowski admitted wounding charges. However, neither was issued any jail time.  Although the presiding judge stated to Evans  “You should understand, and I am sure that you do, in your drunken state and out of control of your senses, the consequences could have been catastrophic if not fatal,” she received a two year  suspended sentence, with 250 hours unpaid work (similar to US community service), and ten days rehabilitation.  She was also ordered to pay £500 (about $666 US) compensation. Kossowski, received a 16 month suspended prison sentence with 200 hours unpaid work and ordered to pay £750 (about $1000 US) compensation.

Copeland's violent ex girlfriend should be in jail. A knife attack is a serious crime.  As for Kossowski‘s ‘Knightly’ actions, was his sentence fair? Is 200 hours unpaid work and paying $1000 an adequate sentence for intentionally attacking and breaking someone's arm? Suppose men turn on Kossowski, attack him and break his arm. Would the Court issue the same sentence to his male attackers? NOT LIKELY. Suppose men began attacking any white knight, stomping on their arms and beating them up.  Would the Court issue only suspended prison sentences, fines and community service to the attackers? NOT LIKELY.

British courts are as corrupt and unjust as American courts.  In this criminal case, the Crown Court's agenda was to minimize repercussions against men acting like white knight thugs in the defense of women.  It sought to limit damage against the feminist notion that women are always innocent.   Rather than being based on justice, this ruling was based on feminist ideology.

September 13, 2016

Why Men Are Avoiding Marriage Today

Men are increasingly avoiding marriage. Their disinterest in being married has caused record low marriage rates in America. According to the Washington Post, single adults now outnumber married adults for the first time in US history.  According to a Pew Research Center analysis, the percentage of American adults who have never been married has reached an historic high.

Sociologists and journalists have advanced bizarre theories attempting to explain men's increasing reluctance to marry. They have blamed men's 'perpetual immaturity, internet porn, misogyny and even video games. None of these theories are even remotely accurate. The reason men are skipping marriage is because feminists have turned the institution into a weapon of abuse against husbands.

A great example of matrimony being used as a weapon was recently published by New York Magazine. Their article titled "Women Are Now Cheating As Much As Men But With Fewer Consequences" insinuates wives cheat because of their husbands failings. The magazine states the internet has made finding a "better"  partner easier. They quote human behavior researcher Helen Fisher, of the Kinsey Institute:
But it is about choice. Women now are more aware of the alternatives to monogamy and more inclined to demand to have all their needs met. That’s because happiness is such an important part of marriage. Fewer women are marrying out of need; instead, they’re marrying to please themselves. But that also means when they’re dissatisfied with something they feel justified to go elsewhere.”
Thus, its a husband's fault his wife is dissatisfied and therefore cheating. In reality, all Fisher's statements prove is that cheating wives are self centered jerks. They expect catering 24/7 but are unwilling to offer the same treatment in return.

NY Magazine also insinuated husbands will get past being cheated on and abused. The article states:
Such was the case with a guy friend whose wife has been having an affair with “some douche bag down the street” while he makes lunches and cleans the kids’ bunnies’ cages, waiting for “the phase to pass” and their marriage to carry on. Or with Randy, a 39-year-old father of four in Idaho who decided to stay with his wife of 17 years after she slept with her business-development coach. “I’m in it for the long haul, till we’re old and gray and sitting on the front porch,” he says, wistfully. “It’s the biggest thing in any marriage to have that trust violated, but I’m not perfect either. And I know she still wants to be here with me.”
The magazine then claimed Los Angeles matrimony therapist Talia Wagner has
"seen a significant rise in the number of couples who come in following a wife’s affair, and that it’s usually the man who wants to try to keep the marriage intact"
Wagner said “For some [husbands], it’s easier. Even in egalitarian marriages, the women are the project managers. But men these days seem to have more to lose emotionally.”

The article tacitly concluded cheating wives shouldn’t be condemned similar to cheating husbands. NY Magazine states:
"women who cheat are less likely to feel condemned by their social group." For example when working wife Lauren told her husband she was cheating, “she thought he might keep it to himself. Wasn’t he humiliated? Instead, he told everyone. “He behaved the way a ‘woman’ would be expected to, telling everyone how horrible I was,” she says. That didn’t mean he didn’t want to try to work it out. Or that she felt especially guilty. “I think if he’d been the one who cheated, he’d have been treated a lot worse,” she says. Instead, she says, most of her friends seemed to sympathize. She’d just done what she needed to do. “Women are more forgiven because it’s the struggle of being a certain type of powerful woman,” she says. “You were a different person when you began the relationship. And he’s just not."
Despite NY Magazine's claims to the contrary, a cheating wife IS THE SAME as a cheating husband. Only a female chauvinist twit (ie a feminist) would claim elsewise. This type of sexist writing explains why men are skipping marriage in ever greater numbers. Why should a man become involved in an institution that  blames a wife's cheating on her husband?

New York Magizane isn’t the only organization promoting husband abuse. An article titled "The Back-Up Plan: Half Of Women In Relationships Have 'Plan B' Man They Can Run Away With" appeared on the health website Medical Daily, the British news site DailyMail and numerous other websites. The article states:
"half of women who are married or in relationships have a Plan B man on standby. And married women are more likely [to] have a Plan B in the background than those who are just in a relationship."
"They [women] understand that anything can happen and are ensuring they have a solid back-up plan should things go sour with their current man,”
 "These survey results suggest men should make sure they are attentive to their women’s needs, even when the relationship is on the rocks"

Lastly, a DirecTV commercial promotes the 'Plan B' theme for wives. The ad, featuring Bon Jovi, publicizes DirecTV's program recording capabilities by showing a husband being replaced by  his wife's past boyfriend. The company states their service gives subscribers the ability to go back in time to record programs and change their life.

Both articles as well as the commercial emphasize the feminist viewpoint that a marriage's health depends on a husband catering to his wife. The wife contributes very little in return.  She is encouraged to ignore and abuse her husband. No major media outlets nor health sites nor commercials promote similar abuse against wives.

After viewing these feminist oriented articles and ads, single men realize becoming a husband is a waste of time. Its the equivalent of throwing your life away. Why should a man become involved in an institution where all cheating is his fault and he is replaced by a 'plan B' sleazeball whenever his self-centered wife believes she is not being acquiesced? Marriage is increasingly avoided. The better deal is remaining single and dating a series of different women. Additionally, a single man can join a hiking, biking, swimming or any other type of club without having a worthless wife such as "Lauren" dragging him down.

June 22, 2016

American Media Promotes Its own Political Agenda

American journalists are trying to control the country's presidential election. Large media outlets such as NBCNews, ABCNews, YahooNews and others have an agenda to derail both Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump's presidential bids. The media continuously degrades Trump and his supporters while Bernie Sanders is presented as a fool. Simultaneously, Hillary Clinton is presented as experienced and popular.

For example, The New York Times published an article titled "Crossing the Line" predominantly claiming that women have bad experiences interacting with Trump. However, one of the women, Rowanne Brewer Lane, interviewed by the New York Times latter claimed the news organization twisted her words inorder promoted their own agenda. She stated "They spun it to where it appeared negative. I did not have a negative experience with Donald Trump."

When Trump supporters were attacked in San Jose by violent left wing extremists, The Los Angeles Times wrote a covering article "Protesters punch, throw eggs at Trump supporters in San Jose" The piece emphasized the newspaper's' agenda that Donald Trump causes violence. The article quotes San Jose mayor Sam Liccardo, "At some point Donald Trump needs to take responsibility for the irresponsible behavior of his campaign"  The article also cavalierly stated "Police were keeping their distance from the crowd as the scuffles played out but kept them from getting any closer to the convention center." Thus, while violent left wing extremists were attacking people, police apparently stood by and did nothing for 90 minutes. Imagine the LATimes reaction if Clinton supporters were attacked by violent right wing extremists. Would they blame Clinton for the attacks?

Lastly, the Huffington Post announced that all Donald Trump article will have a disclaimer:   Editor’s note: Donald Trump regularly incites political violence  and is a serial liar, rampant xenophobe, racist, misogynist and birther who has repeatedly pledged to ban all Muslims — 1.6 billion members of an entire religion — from entering the U.S.

The media's agenda is to discredit Trump as a presidential candidate.

Similarly, the media also has a negative agenda toward Bernie Sanders. For example, when he defeated Hillary in Alaska, Washington and Hawaii, many news outlets claimed Sanders won only because of white voters. This caused the creation of a popular Twitter hashtag #BernieMadeMeWhite by non white Sanders supports. The hashtag pointed out media lies and distortion of facts.  However,  YahooNews,  one of the media sites claiming Sanders had little support among non whites subsequently published an article titled "Unconventional #19: Bernie Sanders’ radical plan for Philadelphia (and more!)". This new article claimed Sanders associates were agitators and black radicals. The reason behind this bizarre article was to portray Sanders as crazy and unelectable.

Lastly, numerous outlets such as the Washington Post, YahooNews, TIME Magazine, NBCNews, Associated Press, ABCNews and CNN posted articles before the California primary proclaiming Hillary as the Democratic Party nominee. The motive behind this media blitz was to discourage Sanders supporters from voting so that Hillary would not suffer defeat in California.

Unlike the other candidates, Hillary Clinton is treated with respect and admiration.

For example MSNBC posted an article "Did Clinton Just Finally Figure Out How to Hit Trump? The article claimed Hillary creatively ripped apart Trump stating "It wasn't just an incredibly well written speech, it was arguably Clinton's most compelling public moment of the entire campaign so far" Yet her speech said not much of anything. It was a typical presidential campaigning speech that claimed her opponent didn’t know what they were doing. These types of mundane claims occur in every US presidential campaign. YahooNews wrote an article titled "Clinton finds footing against Trump as Sanders makes last stand in California". The article cited  many of Hillary's criticisms against Trump and  concluded with a Clinton campaign pitch  “I can’t do any of this alone. I want to finish strong here in California. It means the world to me.”

Hillary Clinton faces little media scrutiny.  The media's agenda is to persuade the public that Hillary is the only viable candidate for president. The reason behind this agenda is feminism. Many news journalists are avowed feminists. As an example, New York Times reporter, Yamiche Alcindor recently asked Bernie Sanders if his staying in the presidential race is sexist  "because it’s getting in the way of what could be the first female president".  Alcindor's idea that its sexist for a man to run against Clinton is representative of the entrenched female chauvinist culture that exists throughout the American news media. Its also no coincidence that news organizations are advancing Sen Elizabeth Warren (herself a staunch feminist who claims all economic problems are caused by men) as vice president.

The United States news media is neither objective nor fair. Many articles are published with the intent of promoting a specific agenda. News organizations are molding political  information in an effort to control who is president of the United States.

June 14, 2016

Destroying a Feminist Narrative

A common feminist narrative is that teenage boys want sex with any female. Therefore, when adult women date boys it should not be a crime. Boys are unharmed.  However, teenage girls are not interested in adult men. Therefore, whenever a teenage girl has sex with any adult male she is irrevocably harmed.

Yet a recent example destroys this feminist myth.

Canada's National Post reports that teacher’s aide, Mrs. Kathy Kitts, 46, admitted having a sexual relationship with a teenage boy. The high school student  was struggling with his class work and turned to the teacher's aide for help. At first his classwork improved. But after a year, things changed. The  teenager states "She wanted to see me at lunch and on spares, see me alone and away from others. I was too young and too trusting to realize what was going  to happen,”  “I had no choice but to agree. If I said no, she wouldn’t help me with homework and I would fail,” “I lost connections, lots of friends and my  family because I never wanted to hang out or get too close because they might figure out my secret,” He said by the 11th grade “She would stalk me all the  time.” “But I feel the need for someone to finally hear my story. I’m not running away any longer … I want this to be over someday. I hope I can crawl out of the  darkness and not pretend like I’m having fun, but to really feel it. To laugh and love without pain stabbing me in my heart. I want everyone to know that  this hurts boys just as much as girls.”  He concluded "My innocence was destroyed by Mrs. Kitts," 

Kathy Kitts was initially charged with sexual assault,  sexual exploitation and telecommunication with a person under 18. she pleaded guilty to sexual exploitation. The other charges were withdrawn by the  prosecution for unknown reasons. Kitts will undergo sexual-behavior and psychiatric assessments before determining her sentencing.

This case clearly shows that boys are not 'made into men' by dating adult women. Yet the feminized western judicial system still views teenage boys as  playthings for grown women. Adult females are treated as a pampered  aristocratic class and are rarely held responsible for their actions. A 2012 study titled Sex-Based Sentencing: Sentencing Discrepancies Between Male and Female Sex Offenders concluded "When all variables, sex, sentence length, and offense category, were considered, a significant difference was recognized in sentence length, and mean sentence length for men was longer, indicating a harsher penalty for the same or similar offense" Women were consistently given lighter sentences than men.

Additionally, the media is  sometimes part of this feminist culture. For example, a New York Times article from 2013 by Julia Hislop claims that "the percentage of female sex offenders who have a history of having been sexually abused tends be  about 75 percent". This questionable claim simply endorses the feminist idea that whenever a woman does something wrong its somebody else's fault.

The time has come to take grown women down off the pedestal and stop treating them as an aristocratic class that is above the law. Its time to stop making excuses  when grown women commit crimes. All adults should be accountable for their actions.

March 8, 2016

Defending Female Teacher Sex Offenders

A 45-year-old teacher, Mrs. Kyle Damato-Kushel, had sex with a 15-year-old boy for nearly two years. He was 13 when the relationship began.  Mrs. Damato-Kushel was arrested and charged with second-degree sexual assault and impairing the morals of a child. Police said the boy told them his first sexual encounter with the teacher occurred in her husband’s ‘man cave,’and that later they had sex elsewhere in the house. Police also claimed Mrs. Kyle Damato-Kushel offered the boy $900 if he wouldn’t reveal their relationship.

Some men expressed anger that the backstabbing wife was arrested over the incident. CBSNews, Connecticut Post and  Heavy.com displayed comments such as
-"I really don't think that it is a big deal, when the student is a male."
-"That dumbass teen got some cougar tail, and now he is complaining about it….how f*cked up is that!"
-"lucky kid."
-"Wake up cuckold. Spending too much time in your precious man cave instead of paying more attention to your wife's needs."
Comparable comments were also made by some men when another female teacher, Mrs Brianne Altice, 33, was convicted of having sex with three teenage boys aged 16 and 17 in June 2015.  Huffington Post, St. Lake Tribune and The Daily Caller displayed  comments such as:

-"Clearly, you have zero testosterone in your body. Putting this woman in jail, Hell this entire trial and investigation was a total waste of tax payer funds."
and responding to the boys cooperating with police against the teacher
-"These cannot be normal high school males !"
Lastly, similar comments were made when math teacher Haeli Wey, 27, was arrested on Dec. 17, 2015. Wey was involved in  sexual relationships with two 17 year old male students at the same time.  Both teens are now fully cooperating with police. The Daily Caller and Statesman.com displayed comments such as:
-"most young guys today are fkn Rats! When I was growing up if you ratted somebody out you'd get your azz kicked and be shunned."
-"Big difference. Young girls fall in love. Young boys are just looking for something to put their penis in, anything."

 The above comments reveal some men are defending female sex offenders. These men have starry-eyed views of women. Females are seen as pure, honest, and incapable of doing wrong.  These men are advocating views echoing those  of feminism.

For instance, comments  blaming a husband for his wife's cheating mirrors feminist philosophy. For several decades feminists  have blamed husbands when their wives cheat. They have also blamed husbands when they cheat on their wives. Thus all  marital infidelity is viewed as the husband's fault. Susan Shapiro Barash is one of thousands of feminists promoting this  female chauvinist trash. 

Comments insulting or threatening boys because they cooperate with police are shielding grown women from accountability for their actions. These men are disgusted by the jailing of women. They want leniency for women  whom commit the same crimes as men. This is judicial double standard. Its the same type of judicial system feminists have  been advocating for years. As an example The National Association of Women Judges wrote  a document titled "Sentencing  Women Offenders: A Training Curriculum for Judges". The document advocates that female felons be given more leniency than  male felons. Feminists have been promoting it as a judicial guideline for nearly 15 years. Another document titled "Women  and the Criminal Justice System: Gender Matters" also supports the idea of a two tiered sentencing system based on gender.  This document was written by a Women's Studies professor at the University of Hawaii.

Comments claiming teenage boys are "lucky" while teenaged girls are raped, reflect feminist ideas that women should be  shielded from disappointment. These men fear a girl will be hurt when an adult male ends a romantic relationship therefore the adult should be jailed. Yet, a teenage  girl will be hurt if her teenage boyfriend breaks up with her. At age 22 she will be hurt if her 25 year old boyfriend breaks up with her. At age 30 she will be hurt if her 35 year old boyfriend breaks up with her. Will all males be  jailed because a female has hurt feelings? Sheryl Sandberg's 'Ban Bossy' campaign is one example of feminists demanding females be shielded from disappointment and criticism.

Comments claiming females fall in love before having sex are idealistic. Did Mrs.  Damato-Kushel love a 15 year old boy?  Did  Brianne Altice love a string of teenage boys? Did Haeli Wey love two 17 year old boys - at the same time!? Not even  remotely.  These women were looking for puppets - someone to control and manipulate. Teenage boys can easily be  manipulated thru sex. Additionally, love is unnecessary in order for a teenage girl to engage in sex. A good looking rock star or rap star could easily go to any high school and pick up dozens of teenage girls for one stands.
Feminists routinely exploit men with starry-eyed views of women inorder to further their agenda. One example is Senators Marco Rubio and Chuck Grassley supporting a feminist proposal titled The Campus Accountability and Safety Act  (CASA). The  Act endorses the expulsion of male students from college on grounds of any rape accusation. The student's guilt or innocence is irrelevant. CASA is primarily the creation of feminist Senators Kirsten Gillibrand (New York) and  Claire McCaskill (Missouri). Gillibrand exploited both Rubio's and Grassley's white knight tendencies convincing them they would be helping 'pure' female students. In reality, all they are doing is furthering Gillibrand and McCaskill's agenda of  limiting male graduation rates via mass expulsions on bogus sexual assault charges. Lowering male graduation rates allows for the transfer of high paying careers to female graduates -  a major feminist goal.

As stated in previous posts, maturity is the overriding determining factor in how well an individual handles a sexual  relationship. Teenage girls mature faster than boys. Therefore girls are mentally more prepared than boys for any sexual  relationship. However, adults dating teens is usually about power and manipulation. Adults are looking for someone they can  control. When men defend a female teacher's sexual conduct they are in essence defending feminism and its goals of control and power over men. They are also defending feminism's idea that women should not be held accountable for their actions.

January 18, 2016