/*CUSTOMIZATIONS*/

Cold Hearted YahooNews Journalist

Sports journalist Steven Psihogios writes:
Prior to the puck drop for Game 2 between the Capitals and Blue Jackets, Washington forward Brett Connolly was trying to be a nice guy. During warmups, Connolly was desperately trying to toss a puck over the glass to an adorable little girl who was seated in the front row.
Unfortunately for the little girl, the man standing in the row behind her had other plans. Connolly, visibly trying to get a puck to the little girl, had his efforts denied multiple times by the adult standing behind her. The man caught the first two pucks tossed over the glass and gave one each to the two boys sitting beside the little girl. Finally, after making it very clear who he wanted to have the third puck, Connolly lobbed it over the glass and it was promptly given to the little girl.
There is something seriously mentally wrong with YahooNews journalist Steven Psihogios.

He is angry the man standing in the row behind the kids - who probably was related to the children - gave pucks to two little boys. He makes it seem as if a growm man was trying to steal the puck from the little girl. The video clip, shows Connolly  trying to flip a puck into the stands toward the little girl. However, the adult male - probably a relative - was trying to get pucks for all three children.

Whats wrong with that?

Psihogios could have simply written - 'Little girl overjoyed at receiving puck'. He could also have  written 'Caps player gives children pucks'. Instead he wrote a quasi feminist article needlessly bashing a man and marginalizing two young children simply because they were male.

This is the same news organiztion that claimed both Patrick Kane (Chicago Black Hawks) and Evander Kane (Buffalo Sabres) were guilty of sexual assault allegations in 2015 and 2016 without having any evidence.

YahooNews sports journalists seems to determine right from wrong on the basis of a person's gender.

April 18, 2018

Six Recent Cases of Female Sex Offenders

In Arizona, 27-year-old Brittany Zamora has been arrested for alleged sexual misconduct with a 13-year-old male student. Mrs. Zamora, a sixth-grade teacher at Las Brisas Academy, allegedly performed oral sex on the young boy inside a school classroom as well as in her car. Police say a parent found text messages between Mrs. Zamora and the male student, indicating sexual activity.

Lisa Kutis of the Goodyear Police Department stated, “The text messages found are sexual in nature that allege an ongoing relationship between the two,” adding, “As a result of an app, which alerted the parents to some keywords, they then checked the cellphone and discovered [sexual] text messages.” The boy said that the sexual relationship started after Zamora started flirting with him in a classroom chat group. She began sending him nude photos of herself.  Police also stated they spoke with a second boy who apparently witnessed one of the sex acts. According to police, the second boy said Mrs. Zamora had also showed him naked pictures of herself.

On March 22, the boy’s father called police saying that Zamora and her husband called him and begged him not to contact the police. Zamora’s husband reportedly stated that Mrs. Zamora made a big mistake but that she loved the kids in her class. The boy’s father added that the husband asked him if they could handle the situation privately, that they should “meet up” and “settle this,” prompting the boy’s father to hang up.

Claiming she mistakenly gave the boy oral sex seems laughable. How does a wife mistakenly give a boy oral sex?   Seems more likely she is shoveling excuses to her husband.

According to KPNX,, several weeks before the alleged sexual encounters, three students wrote to the school principal claiming “elements of favoritism” between Mrs. Zamora and the boy.

Brittany Zamora was booked into Fourth Avenue Jail on two counts of molestation of a child, one count of furnishing harmful material and nine counts of sexual conduct with a minor.

In Iowa, five nursing assistants were arrested. Carolyn Marie Wiedrich, 44; Shelby Mariah Sebring, 24; Jamie Leah Pagel, 32,  Megan Marie Penney 26 and Paige Lynn Johanningmeier 23;  are accused of having sexual contact with patients while working at Prairie View Residential Care Facility. The medical facility treats adult patients with chronic mental illness, intellectual disabilities, or medical conditions. Services include 24 hour staffing, medication management, on site visits by medical doctors and psychiatrists as well as transportation to local medical appointments.

Patients at this facility are dealing with serious mental and emotional issues. The last thing they need is someone taking advantage of them.

Wiedrich is accused of having a patient perform oral sex on her on more than 30 occasions while she worked at the Center. Sebring allegedly had sex with a patient. Pagel allegedly kissed and touched a clothed patient on two occasions court records state.  Megan Marie Penney and Paige Lynn Johanningmeier were arrested for allegedly sneaking patients out of the facility to have sex them. According to the Fayette County Sheriff's Office, all five nursing assistants were charged with 'sexual exploitation by a counselor, therapist or school employee'.

Sheriff Marty Fisher stated “These CNAs have violated the trust of not only their employers, but also the families of these patients who put their trust in these individuals to care for their family members."

The feminist idea of "benevolent women" is obsolete. People should be judged on the basis of their actions not their gender. These six women should not receive public sympathy. In all six cases, grown adult women were looking for someone they could easily manipulate.

Imagine if the genders were reversed. Imagine the reaction if five male nursing assistants were found having sex with patients suffering from mental and emotional issues. Imagine the reaction if a husband / teacher was found giving a 13 year old girl oral sex.

The reaction toward these six female sex offenders should be no different.

April 2, 2018

Harvard Eliminating Men's Organizations But Preserving Women's Organizations

Harvard wants exclusively male social groups such as fraternities or social clubs eliminated. The University claims they are gender exclusionary.  Beginning this year, undergraduate students of male-only social organizations will be banned from holding athletic team captaincies and positions of leadership in any recognized student groups. They will also be barred from fellowships, including Rhodes, Marshall and other scholarships thereby effecting future job opportunities. Lastly male-only clubs will be slapped with sanctions by the University.

Female-only organizations are currently exempt from coed regulations. Initially, exclusively female clubs would fall under the regulations around the year 2022. However, this plan was changed.  The revised plan states female clubs may remain "gender focused" for the next 5 years. During this time period, the school hopes exclusively female clubs will become coed. At the end of the 5 year period, Harvard will assess the positive contributions of female clubs to the campus community. The school will then decide to either make female-only clubs comply with the new coed regulations or give them a new grace period for compliance. At the end of any new grace period, the school retains the option of issuing a subsequent grace period. This is a sneaky violation of Title IX law.

Additionally, there is a new proposal from several faculty members demanding the expulsion of any student joining a gender exclusive club. Since female clubs are currently exempt from coed regulations, the proposal would only apply to male students.

The Dean of the College, Rakesh Khurana, stated his views on men's organizations in a 2016 letter. He wrote:

"Discrimination is pernicious. Stereotypes and bias take hold, normalizing in a community behavior, which should be unacceptable. In this case the discriminatory membership policies of these organizations have led to the perpetuation of spaces that are rife with power imbalances. The most entrenched of these spaces send an unambiguous message that they are the exclusive preserves of men. In their recruitment practices and through their extensive resources and access to networks of power, these organizations propagate exclusionary values that undermine those of the larger Harvard College community.

 Khurana did not state similar views toward exclusively female organizations.

The Harvard Crimson (the University's student newspaper) also expressed a gender double standard. The newspaper said it supports banning students from joining single gender organizations. However,  the Crimson stated   "as we have opined in the past, we wish it was possible for administrators to better distinguish male final clubs and sororities. If the committee seeks to combat exclusivity and foster belonging, arguably sororities can provide a supportive role by giving women a social space on campus." Thus, the chauvinistic Crimson supports banning gender exclusionary groups UNLESS THEY ARE FEMALE-ONLY.

Harvard is located in Boston. Even that city's major newspaper supported the school's policy of sex discrimination.   The Boston Globe stated "But as Harvard attempts to crack down on all-male final (social) clubs, a proposal to ban membership in exclusive clubs could have a disproportionate impact on women, who belong to such organizations in greater numbers." The newspaper quoted a former student claiming "the real world still has ‘old boys clubs’ and that therefore women’s organizations remain necessary balancers and spaces that empower women.” The newspaper asserted that male-only clubs are "all-men bastions" while Harvard’s sororities and women’s final clubs are "an alternative social space to the male final clubs and fraternities". The Globe also wrote "Sororities and single-gender clubs also help women form networks that can help them land jobs, provide recommendations for graduate school, and offer support if they move to a new city, members say".

The Boston Globe sympathizes with female students gaining social support, empowerment and job links from female-only clubs. However, if male-only clubs provide THE EXACT SAME benefits to male students, the sexist news organization implies its discrimination toward women.

This is what happens when feminism becomes part of a University's culture. New ways of sex discrimination are invented, endorsed and then enacted.

Title IX law statesNo person in the United  states shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the  benefits  of,  or  be  subjected  to  discrimination  under  any  educational program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance."  "The protection extends to all aspects of these institutions’ education   programs   and   activities." "Title IX prohibits all forms of sex discrimination, including gender-based harassment, sexual harassment, and sexual violence."

Harvard’s current coed policies violate all of these principals. The school is discriminating against male students and harassing male organizations. Both male and female students should fall under the SAME coed policy and suffer the SAME penalties.

Harvard received about $608 million in federal funds during 2014.The school received approximately the same amount of federal funding in 2016.. All federal funding of Harvard should cease until the school complies with Title IX law.

Feminists at other Universities are already watching Harvard's sex discrimination policies. If Harvard can ignore Title IX law without repercussions then feminist groups will begin recommending similar policies at other colleges.

February 27, 2018