Utah Twitter Account Lists Names of Men Accused of Rape

Women are posting the names of men they claim are rapists on Twitter. They are using the  using the account #UtahRapists. The hashtag, collects tweets  and makes them searchable by name so that anyone can look up men. It appears similar to an an old website called Dont Date Him Girl It.com. That site publicly listed the names of cheating men until it was discovered that many of the women posting names were themselves cheats & frauds. The Dont Date Him Girl stopped publicly listing men's names after numerous threatened lawsuits.

The Twitter account #UtahRapists has no real way of proving the accuracy of the rape accusations against eh men in its list. Women could be falsely accusing someone of  rape without any evidence. Additionally, someone may have committed assault or harassment, but not rape, and still be labeled a rapist by the twitter account. There have already been a few men who claimed they were falsely accused of rape by the account.

Paul C. Burke, a Utah attorney who has been hired by some of the men claiming they are victims of false accusations by #UtahRapists stated: "No person should be branded with a scarlet letter ‘R’ by an anonymous Twitter mob". “There must be accountability for actual rapists, but it should come through our criminal justice system that begins with a presumption of innocence for the accused and operates under the principle of due process for all.”

The #UtahRapists Twitter accounts has admitted  taking some names off their lists, saying that they’ve since found evidence that the accused didn’t rape anyone.  But thats not good enough. The false rape accuser should be named so that other men can avoid her.

A new account should be created #UtahFalseRapeAccusers.  Legal action should also be taken against false rape accusers.

July 27, 2020

New York Times Article Displays Feminazi Ideology

The New York Times recently wrote an article titled 'Why Are Women-Led Nations Doing Better With COVID-19?'  The article emphasized  the feminist idea of female superiority. The Times states:
Monday was a day of triumph for Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern. Thanks to the efforts of the entire nation, she said, New Zealand had been largely successful in meeting its ambitious goal of eradicating, rather than just controlling, outbreaks of COVID-19. The lockdown she had put in place March 25 could now end.
Ardern’s success is the latest data point in a widely noticed trend: Countries led by women seem to be particularly successful in fighting the coronavirus.
Germany, led by Angela Merkel, has had a far lower death rate than Britain, France, Italy or Spain. Finland, where Prime minister Sanna Marin, 34, governs with a coalition of four female-led parties, has had fewer than 10% as many deaths as nearby Sweden. And Tsai Ing-wen, president of Taiwan, has presided over one of the most successful efforts in the world at containing the virus, using testing, contact tracing and isolation measures to control infections without a full national lockdown.
The presence of a female leader may be a signal that a country has more inclusive political institutions and values.
Having a female leader is one signal that people of diverse backgrounds — and thus, hopefully, diverse perspectives on how to combat crises — are able to win seats at that table. 
By contrast, the male-led governments of Sweden and Britain — both of which have high coronavirus death tolls — appear to have relied primarily on epidemiological modeling by their own advisers, with few channels for dissent from outside experts.
"What we learned with COVID is that, actually, a different kind of leader can be very beneficial,”  Alice Evans said. [ a sociologist at King's College London] “Perhaps people will learn to recognize and value risk-averse, caring and thoughtful leaders.”
As of May 28, "female led" New Zealand has 22 virus related deaths with a population of 4.88 million (or 4.5 deaths per million people). Yet nearby male led Australia  has 103 deaths with a population of 25.99 million (4 deaths per million people) How is female led New Zealand doing significantly better?? They are actually worse!

Similarly, Germany has recorded 8533 virus related deaths with a population of 83 million (102.8 deaths per million). Yet, the nearby male led Czech Republic has recorded 317 deaths with a population of 10.65 million (29.8 deaths per million people). Neighbor Poland (male led) recorded 1030 deaths with a population of 37.97 million (27.1 deaths per million people). How does Merkel's response prove female supremacy? She has a higher mortality rate than her neighbors.

The New York Times compared "male led" Sweden with Finland. Sweden is hardly a male led nation. In 2016, Swedish feminist lawmakers passed legislation requiring sidewalks  and bus lanes be cleared before roadways after it snows. This is because a study found women are more likely to travel by foot or public transportation.  The result has been a disaster. Ambulances and fire trucks have difficulty getting to emergencies because public workers are shoveling sidewalks for women. Sweden is more concerned about removing snow according to the feminist principle of female privilege than it is about getting emergency vehicles quickly to their destination.

A more appropriate comparison for Finland  would be with nearby male led Baltic nations of Poland, Lithuania and Latvia.  As discussed above, Poland's virus mortality rate is  27.1 deaths per million people.  Lithuania recorded 68 virus deaths with a population of 2.79 million (24.4 deaths per million people) while Latvia recorded 24 deaths for a population  1.92 million  (12.5 deaths per million people.  Female led Finland is worse than all 3 countries.   Finland has recorded 313 virus related deaths with a population of 5.51 million people (56.8 deaths per million people).

 There is nothing special about any of the three female led nations. They are doing better than some countries but worse than others. Only woman led Taiwan is doing much better than others. They claim 7 deaths for a population of 23.7 million people. One woman doing well hardly makes a case for female supremacy.

The New York Times article was not meant to convey facts or accuracy. It was meant to promote the feminist idea of female superiority. The article is an example of the feminazi culture that exists within this news organization.

May 28, 2020

Joe Biden Threatens Male College Students

Presidential candidate Joe Biden has threatened to roll back the rights of male college students. He stated he will undo Betsy DeVos's Title IX reforms.

Devos's had cancelled the Department of Education's 2011 guidelines for sexual assault.  The old guidelines instructed colleges to use a  minimal standard of proof, called “preponderance of the evidence,” (meaning a 50.1% possibility)  when judging whether a male student was guilty of sexual assault. The standard allowed colleges to kick men out of school based only on an accusation. Devos also recently removed the vague definition of sexual harassment  from  an "unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature." and redefined it to mean a pervasive offense that prevents a student's equal access to the "school's education program or activity". Lastly, her reforms gave an accused student the right to cross examine his accuser via a representative.

Biden wants the Title IX reforms eliminated, the 2011 guidelines restored and labels accusing female students as "survivors". He stated:
Survivors deserve to be treated with dignity and respect, and when they step forward they should be heard, not silenced,” “Today, Betsy DeVos and Donald Trump published a rule that flies in the face of that belief and guarantees that college campuses will be less safe for our nation's young people.”
“Working with survivors and advocates, we helped to bring this violence out of the shadows and required schools change their practices,”  “Now, Trump's Education Department — led by Betsy DeVos — is trying to shame and silence survivors, and take away parents' peace of mind.”
 [Devos's  reforms] “gives colleges a green light to ignore sexual violence and strip survivors of their rights.”
“It's wrong,” “And, it will be put to a quick end in January 2021, because as President, I'll be right where I always have been throughout my career — on the side of survivors, who deserve to have their voices heard, their claims taken seriously and investigated, and their rights upheld.” 
These are ironic statements from Biden because he is currently  being accused of sexual assault by Tara Reade. If he wants a minimal standard of evidence used for judging a male student's guilt then his guilt should also be judged using the same low standard. If he does not want accusing female students cross examined then Ms. Reade should not be cross examined either. Lastly, Ms. Reade should be designated a "survivor" therefore Biden should be kicked out of the Presidential race regardless of actual evidence of guilt.

These guidelines should be used for every politician who advocates taking away the rights of male college students. If one of these legislators is accused of wrong doing then the 'preponderance of the evidence' standard should be used for judging their guilt.  They should not be allowed to cross examine their accuser. Lastly, the accused politician should be kicked out of office regardless of limited evidence of guilt. Let these politicians be treated the same way they advocate male college students be treated.

May 13, 2020