Court Protects Violent White Knight

Daniel Copeland went on vacation with his girlfriend Megan Natasha Evans in Towyn, Great Britain. They were on the last night of their holiday when the violence broke out.

Evans had been drinking and in her drunken state argued with Mr. Copeland. She then pulled out a knife and began screaming and attacking Copeland. Judge Niclas Parry said “It was a sustained, repeated assault by Evans who with a knife caused an injury to the abdomen which was very serious. The victim [Copeland] understandably believed that she was going to stab him."  The judge said she was disarmed but then picked up a second knife and continued attacking her boyfriend.

Raffal Kossowski heard the screaming woman and automatically believed she was being attacked. Kossowski then preceded to act like a white knight dufus. He burst into the couple's room inorder to protect the woman. Kossowski assaulted Mr. Copleand, kicking him with such violent force that he broke Copleand's arm. Copeland was then dragged outside and beaten up by Kossowski friends. The incident left the victim with a broken arm, cuts to his fingers and an injury to the abdomen.

In court both Evans and Kossowski admitted wounding charges. However, neither was issued any jail time.  Although the presiding judge stated to Evans  “You should understand, and I am sure that you do, in your drunken state and out of control of your senses, the consequences could have been catastrophic if not fatal,” she received a two year  suspended sentence, with 250 hours unpaid work (similar to US community service), and ten days rehabilitation.  She was also ordered to pay £500 (about $666 US) compensation. Kossowski, received a 16 month suspended prison sentence with 200 hours unpaid work and ordered to pay £750 (about $1000 US) compensation.

Copeland's violent ex girlfriend should be in jail. A knife attack is a serious crime.  As for Kossowski‘s ‘Knightly’ actions, was his sentence fair? Is 200 hours unpaid work and paying $1000 an adequate sentence for intentionally attacking and breaking someone's arm? Suppose men turn on Kossowski, attack him and break his arm. Would the Court issue the same sentence to his male attackers? NOT LIKELY. Suppose men began attacking any white knight, stomping on their arms and beating them up.  Would the Court issue only suspended prison sentences, fines and community service to the attackers? NOT LIKELY.

British courts are as corrupt and unjust as American courts.  In this criminal case, the Crown Court's agenda was to minimize repercussions against men acting like white knight thugs in the defense of women.  It sought to limit damage against the feminist notion that women are always innocent.   Rather than being based on justice, this ruling was based on feminist ideology.

September 13, 2016

Why Men Are Avoiding Marriage Today

Men are increasingly avoiding marriage. Their disinterest in being married has caused record low marriage rates in America. According to the Washington Post, single adults now outnumber married adults for the first time in US history.  According to a Pew Research Center analysis, the percentage of American adults who have never been married has reached an historic high.

Sociologists and journalists have advanced bizarre theories attempting to explain men's increasing reluctance to marry. They have blamed men's 'perpetual immaturity, internet porn, misogyny and even video games. None of these theories are even remotely accurate. The reason men are skipping marriage is because feminists have turned the institution into a weapon of abuse against husbands.

A great example of matrimony being used as a weapon was recently published by New York Magazine. Their article titled "Women Are Now Cheating As Much As Men But With Fewer Consequences" insinuates wives cheat because of their husbands failings. The magazine states the internet has made finding a "better"  partner easier. They quote human behavior researcher Helen Fisher, of the Kinsey Institute:
But it is about choice. Women now are more aware of the alternatives to monogamy and more inclined to demand to have all their needs met. That’s because happiness is such an important part of marriage. Fewer women are marrying out of need; instead, they’re marrying to please themselves. But that also means when they’re dissatisfied with something they feel justified to go elsewhere.”
Thus, its a husband's fault his wife is dissatisfied and therefore cheating. In reality, all Fisher's statements prove is that cheating wives are self centered jerks. They expect catering 24/7 but are unwilling to offer the same treatment in return.

NY Magazine also insinuated husbands will get past being cheated on and abused. The article states:
Such was the case with a guy friend whose wife has been having an affair with “some douche bag down the street” while he makes lunches and cleans the kids’ bunnies’ cages, waiting for “the phase to pass” and their marriage to carry on. Or with Randy, a 39-year-old father of four in Idaho who decided to stay with his wife of 17 years after she slept with her business-development coach. “I’m in it for the long haul, till we’re old and gray and sitting on the front porch,” he says, wistfully. “It’s the biggest thing in any marriage to have that trust violated, but I’m not perfect either. And I know she still wants to be here with me.”
The magazine then claimed Los Angeles matrimony therapist Talia Wagner has
"seen a significant rise in the number of couples who come in following a wife’s affair, and that it’s usually the man who wants to try to keep the marriage intact"
Wagner said “For some [husbands], it’s easier. Even in egalitarian marriages, the women are the project managers. But men these days seem to have more to lose emotionally.”

The article tacitly concluded cheating wives shouldn’t be condemned similar to cheating husbands. NY Magazine states:
"women who cheat are less likely to feel condemned by their social group." For example when working wife Lauren told her husband she was cheating, “she thought he might keep it to himself. Wasn’t he humiliated? Instead, he told everyone. “He behaved the way a ‘woman’ would be expected to, telling everyone how horrible I was,” she says. That didn’t mean he didn’t want to try to work it out. Or that she felt especially guilty. “I think if he’d been the one who cheated, he’d have been treated a lot worse,” she says. Instead, she says, most of her friends seemed to sympathize. She’d just done what she needed to do. “Women are more forgiven because it’s the struggle of being a certain type of powerful woman,” she says. “You were a different person when you began the relationship. And he’s just not."
Despite NY Magazine's claims to the contrary, a cheating wife IS THE SAME as a cheating husband. Only a female chauvinist twit (ie a feminist) would claim elsewise. This type of sexist writing explains why men are skipping marriage in ever greater numbers. Why should a man become involved in an institution that  blames a wife's cheating on her husband?

New York Magizane isn’t the only organization promoting husband abuse. An article titled "The Back-Up Plan: Half Of Women In Relationships Have 'Plan B' Man They Can Run Away With" appeared on the health website Medical Daily, the British news site DailyMail and numerous other websites. The article states:
"half of women who are married or in relationships have a Plan B man on standby. And married women are more likely [to] have a Plan B in the background than those who are just in a relationship."
"They [women] understand that anything can happen and are ensuring they have a solid back-up plan should things go sour with their current man,”
 "These survey results suggest men should make sure they are attentive to their women’s needs, even when the relationship is on the rocks"

Lastly, a DirecTV commercial promotes the 'Plan B' theme for wives. The ad, featuring Bon Jovi, publicizes DirecTV's program recording capabilities by showing a husband being replaced by  his wife's past boyfriend. The company states their service gives subscribers the ability to go back in time to record programs and change their life.

Both articles as well as the commercial emphasize the feminist viewpoint that a marriage's health depends on a husband catering to his wife. The wife contributes very little in return.  She is encouraged to ignore and abuse her husband. No major media outlets nor health sites nor commercials promote similar abuse against wives.

After viewing these feminist oriented articles and ads, single men realize becoming a husband is a waste of time. Its the equivalent of throwing your life away. Why should a man become involved in an institution where all cheating is his fault and he is replaced by a 'plan B' sleazeball whenever his self-centered wife believes she is not being acquiesced? Marriage is increasingly avoided. The better deal is remaining single and dating a series of different women. Additionally, a single man can join a hiking, biking, swimming or any other type of club without having a worthless wife such as "Lauren" dragging him down.


June 22, 2016

American Media Promotes Its own Political Agenda

American journalists are trying to control the country's presidential election. Large media outlets such as NBCNews, ABCNews, YahooNews and others have an agenda to derail both Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump's presidential bids. The media continuously degrades Trump and his supporters while Bernie Sanders is presented as a fool. Simultaneously, Hillary Clinton is presented as experienced and popular.

For example, The New York Times published an article titled "Crossing the Line" predominantly claiming that women have bad experiences interacting with Trump. However, one of the women, Rowanne Brewer Lane, interviewed by the New York Times latter claimed the news organization twisted her words inorder promoted their own agenda. She stated "They spun it to where it appeared negative. I did not have a negative experience with Donald Trump."

When Trump supporters were attacked in San Jose by violent left wing extremists, The Los Angeles Times wrote a covering article "Protesters punch, throw eggs at Trump supporters in San Jose" The piece emphasized the newspaper's' agenda that Donald Trump causes violence. The article quotes San Jose mayor Sam Liccardo, "At some point Donald Trump needs to take responsibility for the irresponsible behavior of his campaign"  The article also cavalierly stated "Police were keeping their distance from the crowd as the scuffles played out but kept them from getting any closer to the convention center." Thus, while violent left wing extremists were attacking people, police apparently stood by and did nothing for 90 minutes. Imagine the LATimes reaction if Clinton supporters were attacked by violent right wing extremists. Would they blame Clinton for the attacks?

Lastly, the Huffington Post announced that all Donald Trump article will have a disclaimer:   Editor’s note: Donald Trump regularly incites political violence  and is a serial liar, rampant xenophobe, racist, misogynist and birther who has repeatedly pledged to ban all Muslims — 1.6 billion members of an entire religion — from entering the U.S.

The media's agenda is to discredit Trump as a presidential candidate.

Similarly, the media also has a negative agenda toward Bernie Sanders. For example, when he defeated Hillary in Alaska, Washington and Hawaii, many news outlets claimed Sanders won only because of white voters. This caused the creation of a popular Twitter hashtag #BernieMadeMeWhite by non white Sanders supports. The hashtag pointed out media lies and distortion of facts.  However,  YahooNews,  one of the media sites claiming Sanders had little support among non whites subsequently published an article titled "Unconventional #19: Bernie Sanders’ radical plan for Philadelphia (and more!)". This new article claimed Sanders associates were agitators and black radicals. The reason behind this bizarre article was to portray Sanders as crazy and unelectable.

Lastly, numerous outlets such as the Washington Post, YahooNews, TIME Magazine, NBCNews, Associated Press, ABCNews and CNN posted articles before the California primary proclaiming Hillary as the Democratic Party nominee. The motive behind this media blitz was to discourage Sanders supporters from voting so that Hillary would not suffer defeat in California.

Unlike the other candidates, Hillary Clinton is treated with respect and admiration.

For example MSNBC posted an article "Did Clinton Just Finally Figure Out How to Hit Trump? The article claimed Hillary creatively ripped apart Trump stating "It wasn't just an incredibly well written speech, it was arguably Clinton's most compelling public moment of the entire campaign so far" Yet her speech said not much of anything. It was a typical presidential campaigning speech that claimed her opponent didn’t know what they were doing. These types of mundane claims occur in every US presidential campaign. YahooNews wrote an article titled "Clinton finds footing against Trump as Sanders makes last stand in California". The article cited  many of Hillary's criticisms against Trump and  concluded with a Clinton campaign pitch  “I can’t do any of this alone. I want to finish strong here in California. It means the world to me.”

Hillary Clinton faces little media scrutiny.  The media's agenda is to persuade the public that Hillary is the only viable candidate for president. The reason behind this agenda is feminism. Many news journalists are avowed feminists. As an example, New York Times reporter, Yamiche Alcindor recently asked Bernie Sanders if his staying in the presidential race is sexist  "because it’s getting in the way of what could be the first female president".  Alcindor's idea that its sexist for a man to run against Clinton is representative of the entrenched female chauvinist culture that exists throughout the American news media. Its also no coincidence that news organizations are advancing Sen Elizabeth Warren (herself a staunch feminist who claims all economic problems are caused by men) as vice president.

The United States news media is neither objective nor fair. Many articles are published with the intent of promoting a specific agenda. News organizations are molding political  information in an effort to control who is president of the United States.

June 14, 2016