East Georgia College and American Education

At East Georgia College (EGC), a teacher became entangled with America's feminist control educational policies. However, he fought back.

Professor Thomas Thibeault's ordeal started shortly after an August 5, 2009, faculty training session on the school's sexual harassment policy. During the session he asked, "What provision is there in the sexual harassment policy to protect the accused against complaints which are malicious or, in this case, ridiculous?" Mary Smith, Vice President for Legal Affairs, who was conducting the session, replied that there was no such provision to protect the accused. Thibeault then responded "the policy itself is flawed."

Thibeault is correct. Leaving the falsely accused unprotected,the vast majority of them being men, displays a classic feminist mentality. It is the same mentality responsible for the US Deptartment of Education's recent guidelines stating only minimal evidence of sexual assault is needed in order to remove a man from college.

According to Thomas Thibeault’s complaint, the next day, Mary Smith began a retaliatory crusade against him. "Smith summoned numerous East Georgia College's faculty and staff members to her office and demanded that they provide information about their interactions with Thibeault during his tenure with EGC." Two days after the training session, Thibeault was called to the office of EGC president John Bryant Black for a meeting with Mary Smith. The Professor was told to resign. In a letter detailing the events of the meeting, Thibeault wrote that he was told by Black he “was a divisive force in the college at a time when the college needed unity.” Additionally, the president also threatened to make public Thibeault’s “long history of sexual harassment” if he did not. The professor was unaware of any sexual harassement complaints against him and refused to resign. The president then had the police escort him off the campus. Thibeault understood this to mean he was fired.

The professor however hit back. He enlisted the help of an organization called FIRE (Foundation for the Individual Rights in Education). FIRE made Thibeault's case public and demanded evidence of any wrong doing. As a result, in October 2009 president Black wrote "I have made the decision that the evidence does not warrant the charge of sexual harassment."

However, Black did not withdraw his punishment of Thibeault, and the school did not renew Thibeault's contract. On August 5, 2010, Thibeault filed a lawsuit against Black, Smith, and the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia.

In a settlement, recently agreed upon, East Georgia College will pay $50,000 to Professor Thomas Thibeault, provide him with a letter of reference, and the Board of Regents will purge all documents "relating to Thibeault's termination" from his personnel file and all work history records. The defendants also agreed not to discuss those documents with others.

This case shows the level of control feminist have over the American education system. They make policy and can get teachers fired. However, this case also shows the feminist can be beaten. They are not invincible.

Montgomery County False Sexual Assault Claim

A Montgomery County, Texas woman called police claiming her male friend had sexually attacked her in his apartment.

Two officers were then sent to the apartment to investigate the incident. The women told the two officers that her 26-year-old male friend had sexually assaulted her. However, upon further investigation, the deputies watched a video recording the male had made that showed the woman telling him that she was calling the police because he was making her leave the apartment and she would tell the police he assaulted her. After the Montgomery County officers viewed this video, the woman was arrested. Her name has not been released.

What would have happened if this guy did NOT make the video? He would have most likely been wrongly arrested and spent an undetermined time in jail on false charges. Yet feminist continue to claim that women don’t lie about sex crimes.

Furthermore, the fact that the woman's name has not been released appears to indicate the Montgomery County court wants the incident out of public view so they can quietly either dismiss all charges or levy only a small fine. This woman made the false sexual assault complaint because she knew there would be only a small chance she would be punished.

In feminist America, women generally are not held accountable for their actions.

Consider the example of Joanne Baldwin. She was married to actor Dan Baldwin. Earlier this summer, Dan said police told him to take the couple's two children out of the house when the children witnessed Joanne punching him in the face. Additionally, Dan said his wife had watched a documentary on women who killed their husbands and quoted her as saying "'Now I know how to do it, I understand why they did it. You have been warned. Move out of this house or I am going to kill you."

She has received precisely no jail time for what in essence is a domestic violence incident. Additionally, the documentary on killing husbands, no doubt offered an array of excuses on why the wives should not be held accountable for their actions. (And these nitwits can't figure out why men increasingly avoid marriage).

Consider also the recent story of 28 year old wife Amanda Leann Kueht from Houston. She is a substance abuse counselor who was caught in a sexual relationship with a 16 year old boy. Yet many Houston press commenters are stating she did nothing wrong and is a good person.

This wife cheats on her husband - WITH A MINOR- lies to her husband's face and demands he be faithful to her. Yet people claim she is good person. Imagine if the roles were reversed and it was discovered her husband was dating a 16 year old girl. Think he would be categorized as a good person?

In feminist America, women generally are not held accountable for their actions - definitely not to the same degree as men.

US Military Integrity Wilting Under Feminism

The Associated Press stated a married Naval officer and a married female Army soldier had an inappropriate relationship. The naval officer was identified as Capt. Robert Gamberg.

Because of this relationship, the Navy has removed Gamberg from his post as the USS Eisenhower aircraft carrier's second in command. Additionally, the Navy is now considering kicking him out of the service. Rear Adm. Ted Branch, commander of Naval Air Force Atlantic, has recommended that Gamberg be required to show why he should be allowed to remain in the Navy.

However, the United States Military has refused to identify the married female soldier. The Navy said revealing her identity and any other parties involved would be "clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy."

The US military command appears to be frightened of feminists.

One of the fundamental principals of feminism is that cheating wives should be held to a different accountability standard than cheating husbands. If the Navy revealed the wife's name than this principal would be violated.

An example of this accountability double standard was displayed during the infamous Arnold Schwarzenegger affair. Media outlets such as Forbes, Associated Press, TIME, the Huffington Post and others described Schwarzenegger as just another philandering, womanizing husband and asked "How could he have had a child with another women?" "How could he have deceived his wife for so long?" Yet, the woman whom he had child with (Mildred Baena) was also married at the time. She had lied to her husband, telling him the child was his. Reports indicate her husband raised the child for 11 years believing the boy was his son. Only in 2008, during the divorce, did he find out he was lied to. THIS MAN WAS A VICTIM OF PATERNITY FRAUD. None of America's feminist media outlets had a problem with Mildred's cheating, lying and fraud. None of the female chauvinist reporters asked "How could SHE have deceived HER HUSBAND for so long". She was not held accountable.

The military's humiliating a cheating husband but shielding a cheating wife indicates the Department of Defense (DOD) is beginning to wilt under feminist pressure. The DOD is losing its sense of integrity and replacing it with chauvinistic double standards. How can a government institution charged with coordinating operations for the defense of the nation not even defend itself against feminism?

The DOD is becoming another government institution infiltrated by a chauvinistic and corrupt ideology. If feminism has not already negatively impacted the military's efficiency then it will do so in the near future.