Feminist Senator Kirsten Gillibrand Downgrades Male Voters

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand has little regard for male voters.  She has no concern for American men's rights or economic prosperity. Her only interest is the prosperity of women.

For example, the feminist Senator formed a movement called "OffTheSidelines". The movement's website states 

"Off The Sidelines is Senator Kirsten Gillibrand's call to action to encourage every woman and girl to make their voice heard on the issues they care about. Raising your voice truly can change the world."

"Kirsten believes that if more women are elected to office and have a seat at the decision-making table, the outcomes will be better."

"Kirsten is continuing to fight for her women's economic policy agenda aimed squarely at giving working women and their families a fair shot in the new economy. "

The website clearly shows Gillibrand is neither interested in representing nor fighting for men. She has no economic policy for men. She sees her male constituents as inconsequential.

She also views women as smarter and better decision makers than men. She told attendees at the American Progress Ideas Festival.

If it weren't Lehman Brothers, but Lehman Sisters, we might not have had the financial collapse,"

Additionally,  the feminist Senator is angered an effort is currently being made to make sexual assault investigation procedures fair for male college students. students.Her statements show she believes all accused male students are guilty, women never lie and Title IX protection applies only to females. She is actively undermining the rights of men in college.

Lastly, her Variety Magazine interview emphasizes she is concerned only about representing women. She said:

"We have 400 women running for Congress right now, which is a record number. Women did very well in recent elections. Strong women candidates are running and winning. I really value women. I believe we have something of value to contribute to our society and government. Look at the lack of movement in Congress on sexual harassment issues. If you had different people [in Congress] making the decisions, you would have different outcomes."

She does not "really value" men.  Only women matter. Additionally, her statements during the interview show she has no interest in protecting men from false rape accusations. Every  accused  man is presumed guilty.

Senator Gillibrand views men as irrelevant.  She has no interest in the welfare of working men or protecting them from false rape accusations.   She is uninterested in protecting the rights of male college students. Gillibrand sees herself strictly as a representative of women. Since she has such a negative and sexist view of men, why should any male voters support her?