President Obama recently awarded 16 Americans the Presidential Medal of Freedom. The award was created by President Kennedy to recognize those individuals who have made an especially meritorious contribution to the security or national interests of the United States, world peace, cultural or other significant public or private endeavors. Many of the recipients were questionable.
For example, the President awarded one medal to political ally & crony Bill Clinton. Is every president now going to award a Freedom Medal to cronies from their own Party? This is what 3rd world countries do. Another recipient was Oprah Winfrey. She donated thousands of dollars to Obama's re-election campaign and helped him raise millions thru private fundraisers.
An even more questionable recipient is former astronaut Sally Ride. The Obama Administration claims she advocated for science education and also gender equality in the classroom. This is false. Ms. Ride did little for boys education. In an era where boys face discrimination from America's female chauvinist school system and are struggling academically compared with girls, Ms Ride created education programs oriented primarily or entirely toward girls.
For example, her Science Camps encouraged girls, but not boys, interests in science. According to Education Unlimited, the camps provide "girls {NOT BOYS] an opportunity to explore science, technology, and engineering through experiments and observations while staying on a university campus". Also, Sally Ride's Science festivals are aimed toward girls. These Festivals are designed to create interest in pursuing careers in science & engineering. According to the Temporal Dynamics of Learning Center, the Festivals are "events for 5th-8th grade girls, held on college campuses across the country." The festivals feature science games, experiments and workshops as well as guest speakers, food and music. The USAToday states the "Science festivals alone have reached more than 52,000 girls." This certainly is NOT educational equality.
Perhaps the most appalling recipient was notorious feminist Gloria Steinem. This is a woman famous for advocating 'A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle'. She claims men need women but the reverse is NOT true. She also claims rape and violence are a result of the 'cult of masculinity'. Lastly, in the 2008 Democratic Party primary, Steinem demanded voters select Hillary Clinton rather than Barack Obama as the Party's presidential candidate. She believed Hillary's redeeming qualification for office was that she was a woman (indeed a white woman just like herself). This is in fact the essence of Steinem. Her philosophy is that an individual's qualifications and characteristics are to be judged on the basis of their gender not their actions. To Steinem, gender is of paramount importance. Gloria Steinem is a narrow minded female chauvinist jackass - in otherwords she is a true feminist.
Another recipient was Daniel Inouye. He fought in World War II with the 442nd Regimental Combat Team, survived the war and was later elected to the Hawaii Territorial House of Representatives, the United States House of Representatives, and ultimately the United States Senate. This is the type of person in which the Medal of Freedom was intended - not a political crony, not a financial backer and certainly not a female chauvinist halfwit.
Awarding questionable individuals the Freedom Medal degrades the value of the honor thereby making the medallion increasingly worthless.
False Rape at Ohio State University
A drunk couple, both 20-year-old students from Ohio State University, were videoed by onlookers in a sex act against the window of a bank on the morning of Oct. 12. The couple were not aware they were being recorded. The explicit video was then circulated via social media by the onlookers. Thereafter, the woman told police she was a victim of a sexual assault.
Local prosecutor Keller Blackburn said the video showed the woman smiling during the incident. It also showed the man asking if he should stop and the woman telling him to continue. Afterwords, the students went to the man’s apartment. They stayed there for three hours before he walked her home. Blackburn said testing showed no sign of any “date rape drug,”.
The female student obviously committed rape fraud. She wanted to be the best party head she could be without having any responsibility for her actions. However, once the embarrassing incident became public, she falsely accused her partner of rape.
This type of mentality is all too common in America's growing false rape culture. It is a culture created by feminist organizations such as the American Association of University Women (AAUW) and supported by the US Department of Education. Many of the Department's student behavior guidelines are based entirely on sexual harassment definitions and behavior codes issued by the AAUW. Any learning institution not following these guidelines is sued by the National Women's Law Center. The guidelines are often founded in female chauvinism (ie feminism). For example, as discussed in 2011, under the “preponderance of the evidence" guideline, if 2 drunk students have sex and the female latter regrets it, the incident is classified as sexual assault. The male student can be kicked out of college. This means the drunk male student is responsible for both his and the female student's behavior. Furthermore, if its the male student who latter regrets having sex (for example with an ugly girl) it is classified as nothing. No actions can be taken against the female student. Lastly, the “preponderance of the evidence" guideline does NOT apply to false rape.
Feminist, however, had underestimated the level of male anger at their legalized sexism. They thought the new generation of men would be as docile and obedient as the previous generation of men.
After viewing the Ohio video, many male students were angered that the women falsely accused her partner of rape. Their anger only intensified when larger websites such as Thinkprogress.org, Buzzfeed.com and the always female chauvinist Cafemom.com posted articles supporting the idea the incident was a case of sexual assault. Several Men's Rights Activists (MRAs) subsequently posted the name of the woman they thought committed the rape fraud. Men began focusing their rage upon this student. The female student then deactivated all of her social media accounts, didn't leave her sorority house for days, and asked the University to excuse her from classes. Most commenters appear 90% certain the female student committing false rape was correctly identified. However 90% is not 100%. Even the MRA's who originally identified her are not 100% certain they are correct. Additionally, the women claims she was not involved in the incident.
Her name should not have been released.
Suppose she is innocent. Why should an innocent women pay for the crimes of a different woman? These MRA's, though well intentioned, reacted emotionally and let their anger get the best of them. The correct strategy in all potential false rape cases is to wait and see what happens. Observe how the man is being treated by the police, the judicial system, the University and finally the media. If he receives abuse and discrimination from these entities and is wrongly convicted or expelled thats when MRA's /Anti feminists should move into the offensive. Under these circumstances, the women making the false accusation should be identified. If this cannot be done with 100% certainty, then MRA"s/AF's should hit back at the organizations shielding the criminal or promoting rape fraud. This would include people such as the local police, chief, local prosecutor, dean of students or university president, journalists and prominent websites. Point out their sexism and hypocrisy. When enough people are educated about the sexist nature of these entities then the real revolution to overthrow the ruling feminist yoke can begin.
The Ohio State University incident demonstrates there is a growing rape fraud culture on American campuses. It is a culture fostered by the AAUW and the "Preponderance of the evidence" guideline. Many women believe they can party away without being responsible for their actions. If they do something regrettable they can blame a man. The feminist guideline that drunk men are responsible for drunk women's behavior needs to be overthrown. Any University practicing this principle should be sued on grounds of sex discrimination.
The Ohio student who made the false rape accusation should be kicked out of school.
Local prosecutor Keller Blackburn said the video showed the woman smiling during the incident. It also showed the man asking if he should stop and the woman telling him to continue. Afterwords, the students went to the man’s apartment. They stayed there for three hours before he walked her home. Blackburn said testing showed no sign of any “date rape drug,”.
The female student obviously committed rape fraud. She wanted to be the best party head she could be without having any responsibility for her actions. However, once the embarrassing incident became public, she falsely accused her partner of rape.
This type of mentality is all too common in America's growing false rape culture. It is a culture created by feminist organizations such as the American Association of University Women (AAUW) and supported by the US Department of Education. Many of the Department's student behavior guidelines are based entirely on sexual harassment definitions and behavior codes issued by the AAUW. Any learning institution not following these guidelines is sued by the National Women's Law Center. The guidelines are often founded in female chauvinism (ie feminism). For example, as discussed in 2011, under the “preponderance of the evidence" guideline, if 2 drunk students have sex and the female latter regrets it, the incident is classified as sexual assault. The male student can be kicked out of college. This means the drunk male student is responsible for both his and the female student's behavior. Furthermore, if its the male student who latter regrets having sex (for example with an ugly girl) it is classified as nothing. No actions can be taken against the female student. Lastly, the “preponderance of the evidence" guideline does NOT apply to false rape.
Feminist, however, had underestimated the level of male anger at their legalized sexism. They thought the new generation of men would be as docile and obedient as the previous generation of men.
After viewing the Ohio video, many male students were angered that the women falsely accused her partner of rape. Their anger only intensified when larger websites such as Thinkprogress.org, Buzzfeed.com and the always female chauvinist Cafemom.com posted articles supporting the idea the incident was a case of sexual assault. Several Men's Rights Activists (MRAs) subsequently posted the name of the woman they thought committed the rape fraud. Men began focusing their rage upon this student. The female student then deactivated all of her social media accounts, didn't leave her sorority house for days, and asked the University to excuse her from classes. Most commenters appear 90% certain the female student committing false rape was correctly identified. However 90% is not 100%. Even the MRA's who originally identified her are not 100% certain they are correct. Additionally, the women claims she was not involved in the incident.
Her name should not have been released.
Suppose she is innocent. Why should an innocent women pay for the crimes of a different woman? These MRA's, though well intentioned, reacted emotionally and let their anger get the best of them. The correct strategy in all potential false rape cases is to wait and see what happens. Observe how the man is being treated by the police, the judicial system, the University and finally the media. If he receives abuse and discrimination from these entities and is wrongly convicted or expelled thats when MRA's /Anti feminists should move into the offensive. Under these circumstances, the women making the false accusation should be identified. If this cannot be done with 100% certainty, then MRA"s/AF's should hit back at the organizations shielding the criminal or promoting rape fraud. This would include people such as the local police, chief, local prosecutor, dean of students or university president, journalists and prominent websites. Point out their sexism and hypocrisy. When enough people are educated about the sexist nature of these entities then the real revolution to overthrow the ruling feminist yoke can begin.
The Ohio State University incident demonstrates there is a growing rape fraud culture on American campuses. It is a culture fostered by the AAUW and the "Preponderance of the evidence" guideline. Many women believe they can party away without being responsible for their actions. If they do something regrettable they can blame a man. The feminist guideline that drunk men are responsible for drunk women's behavior needs to be overthrown. Any University practicing this principle should be sued on grounds of sex discrimination.
The Ohio student who made the false rape accusation should be kicked out of school.
November 5, 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)