Highland Middle School of Indiana recently suspended 3 boys because they saw either a nude or racy photo of their female teacher.
The teacher in question had given the 13 year old students access to a school-owned IPad, which had been assigned to her, for the purpose of working with several applications. The students went to an unauthorized application called IPhotos. This application contained a photo of the teacher.
A parent of one of the students claimed the teacher was topless in the picture. Highland school claims the photo was not topless and there was no nudity nor pornography. The local Police Department, which investigated the incident said the photo was of a partially covered woman. The students were given the choice of being suspended or expelled. They choose suspension.
Why were these boys suspended? They did not steel equipment. It was given to them. They pushed some buttons and out popped a racy photo of the teacher. Its not their fault. They didn't take the picture.
Obviously, the female teacher made a mistake and somehow allowed her private photos to be linked to school equipment. Highland Middle School refused to say what disciplinary actions would be taken against this teacher (meaning nothing would happen to her). So, if this institution is so willing to assume that an ADULT woman made a technical mistake WHY WONT IT ASSUME 13 YEAR OLD BOYS MADE A TECHNICAL MISTAKE?? Why are minors held to a higher degree of accountability than an adult woman?
The decision to suspend boys is in line with harassment policies promoted by the American Association of University Women (AAUW) and The National Women's Law Center (NWLC). These two feminist groups are largely responsible for creating prevailing student conduct codes. Many of the Department of Education's student behavior guidelines are based entirely on sexual harassment definitions and behavior codes issued by the AAUW. Any learning institution not following the guidelines is sued by the NWLC. This is why male students can easily be expelled from colleges on false rape charges.
Feminist intent is to hinder boys education as much as legally possible. Allowing schools to easily suspend or expel boys achieves this goal. (Note: According to a study released by the National Bureau of Economic Research in 2011, boys are suspended at more than twice the rate of their female peers).
Imagine if the roles were reversed and a group of 13 year old girls called up a racy photo of their male teacher. Think the girls would be suspended?? NOT LIKELY.
What these Highland School boys need to learn from this incident is that they were victims of feminism. Additionally it will fall on the shoulders of their generation to overturn the entire rotten and corrupt feminist social order in America.