Changing Attitudes Regarding A Backstabbing Wife

For many decades, feminist have promoted the viewpoint that cheating wives are honest women. They cheat because of their husband's self-centeredness or laziness or other character flaw he possess. Articles such as Psychology Today's "Women Who Cheat on Relationships", Womens Day's "Why I Cheated on My Husband" and Redbook's "My Wife Cheated On Me" all promote this attitude.  Conversely, a backstabbing husband is viewed differently than a backstabbing wife. Most media outlets, including Psychology Today, Womans Day and Redbook write articles claiming husbands cheat because they are liars and selfish. In fact, Redbook heavily criticized a husband merely for flirting.

However, reader comments in several media outlets indicates changing public opinion regarding a backstabbing wife.

On Yahoo's Dear Abbey, a husband wrote he inadvertently discovered email messages between his wife of 45 years and another man. She planned to secretly meet the man, a former business client, at a hotel in his home town during a convention. Her phone records confirmed daily secret long-distance conversations between the two.

 Public reaction was decidedly against the married woman.

 Typical comments were "sorry Sir--don't delude yourself. Exit gracefully, and with YOUR head held high. Someone will appreciate an honest man. Your wife obviously" and does not." and " Sorry dude, they don't start 'drifting 'after 45 years, she's had all she wanted while you were busting your butt to keep a roof over her head. Get yourself a good legal team, and investigator. You will be shocked what they can find out about her past affairs!!!"  and "Heres the reality with the guy whose wife is going to a convention to cheat on him--When he confronts her about the email she will act wounded,scream how he invaded her privacy and then tell him if there is no trust there should be no marriage. She will then stomp off indignantly and get a lawyer,screw her husband over and take him for what she can and after she has picked him to the bones she will still have the sex she wanted with that guy but this time she will act self righteous and the wounded party for those that believe her lies."

Some readers even pointed out Dear Abbey's promotion of feminist double standard. For example, one reader stated "I love it last month or the month before there was a letter from a woman that her husband was cheating. The first words were, get a lawyer, file for divorce and sue him for everything you can. What happened this time? Why not tell him to dump the cheating B*&*CH and get a lawyer to sue for everything he can? What double standard of BS advice to give to this guy. Take the advice she gave the wife of a cheating husband last month."

At the Huffington Post, public reaction to a wife's infidelity was similar. This outlet displayed a video of a husband crashing his SUV into his house after catching his wife cheating. Some typical responses were "Not me. I'm not going to ruin anything I own. Just turn around and walk away. She's obviously not worth it." and "I am not sure how destroying your own house (and likely getting arrested) constitutes revenge. It hurts to get cheated on and really sucks to catch them in the act but take a walk and preserve your dignity and your assets. Dump the wife, keep the house. That is revenge."

Admittedly, there were readers at both outlets defending the backstabbing women. They continued promoting the old feminist viewpoint that a wife's cheating is her husband's fault. These readers made statements such as "The husband may have done something wrong" and "Maybe he was a lousy husband" and the husband is "a schmuck".

Perhaps the most stunning reversal of opinion appeared on the usually female chauvinist website CafeMom. A backstabbing wife wrote that she had an affair when she wasn't getting along with her husband. The affair lasted 5 months. Ultimately, she became pregnant by her boyfriend. The boyfriend ended the relationship once the pregnancy arose - not an unusual reaction for sleazeballs who date married women. She then worked on making her marriage better. Three years after the affair, she confessed to her husband. Surprisingly, many readers were unsympathetic to the backstabbing woman.

Typical comments were: "She waited till their relationship was going well to tell him because she feared if she told him while they were having problems, he'd leave. That's selfish. Cheating is selfish." and "Odds are every time it gets hard she will turn somewhere else."  Many also stated that the husband should get tested for STD's. However, there were a few women promoting old feminist double standards. They stated "If [the husband] loves her, he will drop his pride and make it work" and their bonds "can be even stronger" because of her honesty after 5 months of cheating.

Despite continuing feminist propaganda within the media, people's attitudes regarding marital backstabbing are changing. More people are holding women accountable for their behavior. Slowly, the public is reaching the conclusion a backstabbing wife and a backstabbing husband are the SAME THING.

Norfolk Court Rejects Jail For Female Sex Offender

Patience Perez, 22, had a sexual relationship with a 15-year-old boy while working as a security assistant at Renaissance Academy in Virginia Beach. Perez (who is married with children) had sex with the boy at her house as well as the boy's house.

The illegal affair ended when the boy's mother went to police after finding naked pictures of Perez on her son's phone. Norfolk police spokeswoman Karen Parker-Chesson said Perez and the boy used mobile phones to exchange pornographic images.  Ms. Parker-Chesson also said Perez and the boy engaged in at least one conversation to plan to kill Perez's husband.

Despite these actions, Norfolk's County Court issued only a suspended seven month sentence to Perez. Additionally, she must get counseling, have no contact with the victim and register as a sex offender. The charges relating to the planned murder of her husband were dropped.  Norfolk's feminist judicial system gave no explanation for the dropped charges.

The boy's mother was not happy with the lenient sentence. "We haven't wrapped our brain around it. It doesn't make sense. It's like we endured all this pain all this stress and for this to happen. Just like an arrow to the heart." In a previous interview, according to the website 'Scallywagandvagabond.com', the mother stated "She took  advantage of a teenage boy that had depression issues, anger issues." 

Imagine if the roles were reversed. Suppose a 22 year old male guard had a sexual relationship with a 15 year girl and talked about killing his wife. Think he'd get no jail time?

Norfolk’s leniency is similar to a court decision in Tennessee. According to a Tennessee police report, Elizabeth 'Leigh' Garner, 42 followed a 12-year-old boy into a bathroom at a party. She groped him and tried to remove his shorts so she could perform oral sex on him. She claimed she was drunk and thought the boy was a man. The Tennessee Circuit Court sentenced her to NOTHING. She merely has to attend Alcoholics Anonymous meetings.

Imagine a 42 year old man claiming he was drunk and thought a 12 year old girl was a women. Think he would get a jail sentence? Think he would have to register as a sex offender?

Many, American courts appear to be using a document titled "Sentencing Women Offenders: A Training Curriculum for Judges" written by The National Association of Women Judges. This feminist document advocates that female felons should be given more leniency than male felons.

A crime is not different just because a female is the perpetrator. Female sex offenders should be treated the same as male offenders. America's feminist kangaroo judicial system is a farce.

Thinkprogress Goads False Rape Charges on College Campuses

In a recent article, the progressive liberal website, Thinkprogress.org, promoted a false rape culture against male college students. The article, mockingly titled "Rape Victims Are Just As Guilty As Rapists If They’re Both Drunk", claimed that if 2 drunk students have sex, the male student should be convicted of rape.

According to the website, women cannot give consent for sex when they are drunk. Therefore, if a female student has sex with a man while drunk but later regrets her actions the man is a rapist. The website wants him kicked out of school and convicted. The site stated "research into college rapists reveals that sexual assault is premeditated and victims are carefully chosen. Alcohol is a tool that rapists often use, but it’s simply one tool among many." Thinkprogress believes an adult woman should not be responsible for her actions while drunk but an adult man SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE for both his actions as well as the woman's actions while he is drunk.

Thinkprogress is not an obscure, fringe website. Out of millions of American based sites, Thinkprogress is ranked by the company ALEXA approximately 960th in the United States . As a comparison, CBSNews is ranked about 290th.

This narrow minded website claims sex should only occur with the consent of a sober woman. Consent is not needed from a man. Thus if both students are drunk - EVEN THOUGH THE MALE STUDENT IS UNABLE TO GIVE CONSENT IN A SOBER STATE - the female student is not a rapist. As an example, in October 2013, two drunk Ohio  State University students had sex. The female student later regretted it. The male student was then falsely accused of rape. Thinkprogress viewed the male student as a rapist whom should be kicked out of school and prosecuted. The site claimed his drunken state was irrelevant and that the female student did not need his consent. She therefore should not be accused of rape.

Conversely, if the roles are reversed, the internet site reaches a diferrent conclusion. If a drunk male student regrets having sex (such as with an overweight ugly female or a well known arrogant sorority girl), Thinkprogress does NOT consider it sexual assault. The website implores that sexual assault is only when a drunk FEMALE regrets her actions.

This gender double standard is classic feminism. The progressive website judges people on the basis of their gender RATHER THAN THEIR ACTIONS. In fact, judging people on the basis of their gender or race or religion is a fundamental pillar of progressive liberalism.

This internet site, along with feminist groups such as the American Association of University Women and National Organization of Women are attempting to erode civil rights on college campuses. They are advocating university conduct codes be altered so that men can more easily be kicked out of school. These groups have had previous success in changing conduct codes. In 2011, their influence within the US Dept of Education pushed the agency to alter University student behavior guidelines. Under the new guidelines, minimal evidence of sexual assault is needed for colleges to remove male students from school. This has resulted in men being booted from campus after false rape accusations.

By further eroding civil rights, organizations such as ThinkProgress believe thousands of additional male students can be removed from colleges across the country by false accusations. The impetus for this removal is a 2010 study by the research firm Reach Advisors. The study discovered that single women age 22-30 outearn men in most American cities. The Firm cited college education as the main reason for the gender pay gap. Significantly more women than men earn degrees.
Preventing thousands of men from obtaining degrees by altering guidelines so male students can more easily be kicked out of school on false rape accusations is the main feminist goal. Less men with degrees means more high paying skilled jobs go to educated women.

This is why ThinkProgress promotes the propaganda statement "at least one in four college women will be sexually assaulted during their academic career". Thousands of women being raped means thousands of men are the culprits.

The promotion of false rape by ThinkProgress is another example of the sexist feminist mindset.